Conservation implications of species–genetic diversity correlations
Kahilainen, A., Puurtinen, M., & Kotiaho, J. S. (2014). Conservation implications of species–genetic diversity correlations. Global Ecology and Conservation, 2(December), 315-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2014.10.013
Julkaistu sarjassa
Global Ecology and ConservationPäivämäärä
2014Oppiaine
Ekologia ja evoluutiobiologiaBiologisten vuorovaikutusten huippututkimusyksikköMuseoEcology and Evolutionary BiologyCentre of Excellence in Biological Interactions ResearchMuseumTekijänoikeudet
© 2014 The Authors.
Despite its importance for the long-term viability of populations and functioning of ecosystems, the genetic diversity of populations is seldom given explicit consideration in conservation prioritization. Research on the species–genetic diversity correlation (SGDC) suggests that species diversity within a community and intrapopulation genetic diversity are positively correlated, due to the parallel influences of environmental characteristics (area, connectivity, and environmental heterogeneity) on both levels of diversity. A positive locality scale SGDC (i.e. -SGDC) thus provides potential for simultaneous conservation of both species diversity within a locality and intrapopulation genetic diversity. However, caution is needed, since in some situations environmental characteristics can influence species diversity and genetic diversity differently, resulting in a negative -SGDC. In such cases there can be a conflict between conservation of species diversity within localities and genetic diversity within populations. SGDCs provide useful information also for conservation planning, which considers compositional differences between localities, since the mechanisms behind -SGDCs can also drive correlations between differentiation of community and genetic compositions (i.e. -SGDCs). We suggest that emphasizing locality area and connectivity between similar localities in conservation planning best conserves both species and intrapopulation genetic diversity, and that focusing on highly complementary species richness may compromise conservation of genetic diversity.
...
Julkaisija
Elsevier BVISSN Hae Julkaisufoorumista
2351-9894Julkaisu tutkimustietojärjestelmässä
https://converis.jyu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/24024743
Metadata
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedotKokoelmat
- Matemaattis-luonnontieteellinen tiedekunta [5682]
- Tiedemuseo [37]
Rahoittaja(t)
Suomen AkatemiaRahoitusohjelmat(t)
Akatemiatutkija, SALisätietoja rahoituksesta
This study was funded by the Academy of Finland (via Centre of Excellence in Evolutionary Research, Centre of Excellence in Biological interactions, Biological Interactions Graduate School, and project funding of MP [grant number 258385]), and Kone foundation (personal grant of AK).Lisenssi
Samankaltainen aineisto
Näytetään aineistoja, joilla on samankaltainen nimeke tai asiasanat.
-
Comparing RADseq and microsatellites for estimating genetic diversity and relatedness : Implications for brown trout conservation
Lemopoulos, Alexandre; Prokkola, Jenni M.; Uusi-Heikkilä, Silva; Vasemägi, Anti; Huusko, Ari; Hyvärinen, Pekka; Koljonen, Marja-Liisa; Koskiniemi, Jarmo; Vainikka, Anssi (John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2019)The conservation and management of endangered species requires information on their genetic diversity, relatedness and population structure. The main genetic markers applied for these questions are microsatellites and ... -
Integrative phylogenetic, phylogeographic and morphological characterisation of the Unio crassus species complex reveals cryptic diversity with important conservation implications
Lopes-Lima, M.; Geist, J.; Egg, S.; Beran, L.; Bikashvili, A.; Van Bocxlaer, B.; Bogan, AE.; Bolotov, IN.; Chelpanovskaya, OA.; Douda, K.; Fernandes, V.; Gomes-dos-Santos, A.; Gonçalves, DV.; Gürlek, ME.; Johnson, NA.; Karaouzas, I.; Kebapçı, Ü.; Kondakov, AV.; Kuehn, R.; Lajtner, J.; Mumladze, L.; Nagel, K-O.; Neubert, E.; Österling, M.; Pfeiffer, J.; Prié, V.; Riccardi, N.; Sell, J.; Schneider, LD.; Shumka, S.; Sîrbu, I.; Skujienė, G.; Smith, CH.; Sousa, R.; Stöckl, K.; Taskinen, J.; Teixeira, A.; Todorov, M.; Trichkova, T.; Urbańska, M.; Välilä, S.; Varandas, S.; Veríssimo, J.; Vikhrev, IV.; Woschitz, G.; Zając, K.; Zając, T.; Zanatta, D.; Zieritz, A.; Zogaris, S.; Froufe, E. (Elsevier, 2024)The global decline of freshwater mussels and their crucial ecological services highlight the need to understand their phylogeny, phylogeography and patterns of genetic diversity to guide conservation efforts. Such knowledge ... -
Identifying Large Ecological Networks with Spatial Conservation Prioritization Methods to Benefit Regional Land-use Planning
Jalkanen, Joel; Moilanen, Atte; Toivonen, Tuuli (Open Science Centre, University of Jyväskylä, 2018)The current biodiversity crisis is a major environmental problem to be solved. Land-use planning should respond to the near-ubiquitous decline in habitats and their ecological quality, which derives from e.g. urban expansion ... -
Spatial conservation prioritization of Finnish forests for more sustainable land use planning
Mikkonen, Ninni; Leikola, Niko; Lahtinen, Ari; Lehtomäki, Joona; Halme, Panu; Haapalehto, Tuomas; Hokkanen, Marja; Lilja-Rothsten, Saara; Syrjänen, Kimmo; Wallenius, Tarja (Open Science Centre, University of Jyväskylä, 2018)Accelerating use of natural resources causing harmful impacts on biodiversity, together with limited resources for conservation, highlight the importance of developing cost-effective, ecologically sustainable land use ... -
Landowner preferences and conservation prioritization : response to Nielsen et al
Eyvindson, Kyle; Repo, Anna; Burgas Riera, Daniel; Mönkkönen, Mikko (Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc., 2017)
Ellei toisin mainittu, julkisesti saatavilla olevia JYX-metatietoja (poislukien tiivistelmät) saa vapaasti uudelleenkäyttää CC0-lisenssillä.