Study success at the Turku University of Applied Sciences : Comparison between students of path studies background and joint-application background and comparison between different study fields
Roos, Emmi (2021-11-22)
Study success at the Turku University of Applied Sciences : Comparison between students of path studies background and joint-application background and comparison between different study fields
Roos, Emmi
(22.11.2021)
Julkaisu on tekijänoikeussäännösten alainen. Teosta voi lukea ja tulostaa henkilökohtaista käyttöä varten. Käyttö kaupallisiin tarkoituksiin on kielletty.
avoin
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on:
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe202201071514
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe202201071514
Tiivistelmä
This thesis examines the study success of different student groups of Turku University of Applied Sciences. Study success is measured in this research with the amount of credits and weighted grade point average. Two research questions are presented to explore the phenomenon, first one concerns the possible difference in the study success of path students and students with joint-application background. The second research question looks at the differences between the study success of four different study fields. The data has been collected from the groups of students starting their studies in the Turku University of applied sciences in four semesters: autumn 2017, spring 2018, autumn 2018, and spring 2019. Theoretical background of the thesis is based on the previous studies on the factors which affect study success in higher education.
Results of this study show that there are no statistically significant differences between the study success of students with path studies background in comparison with students with joint application background. Nevertheless, when looking at the differences between different study fields, statistically significant differences can be found. Results provide new knowledge about the study success of the students studying in the universities of applied sciences. Results show that the way of access to universities of applied sciences does not seem to relevant for the later success in studies and that instead, other factors, such as study field, explain the differences in study success.
Results of this study show that there are no statistically significant differences between the study success of students with path studies background in comparison with students with joint application background. Nevertheless, when looking at the differences between different study fields, statistically significant differences can be found. Results provide new knowledge about the study success of the students studying in the universities of applied sciences. Results show that the way of access to universities of applied sciences does not seem to relevant for the later success in studies and that instead, other factors, such as study field, explain the differences in study success.
Samankaltainen aineisto
Näytetään aineisto, joilla on samankaltaisia nimekkeitä, tekijöitä tai asiasanoja.
-
A Cross-Cohort Study Examining the Associations of Metabolomic Profile and Subclinical Atherosclerosis in Children and Their Parents: The Child Health CheckPoint Study and Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children
Saffery R; Juonala M; Carlin JB; Dwyer T; Cheung M; Ferreira DLS; Lawlor DA; Wake M; Ellul S; Burgner DPBackground-High-throughput nuclear magnetic resonance profiling of circulating metabolites is suggested as an adjunct for cardiovascular risk evaluation. The relationship between metabolites and subclinical atherosclerosis ... -
Sustainability Studies in Universities : Review on Study Modules of Sustainable Development and Responsible Business in Finnish and some European Universities
Heikkilä, Katariina
FFRC eBOOK : 13/2015 (Turun yliopisto. Turun kauppakorkeakoulu, 21.05.2019) -
The Association between Growth and Neurodevelopment in Very Preterm Infants – A Follow-up Study in the PIPARI Study
Leppänen, Marika
Turun yliopiston julkaisuja. Sarja D, Medica – Odontologica : 1131 (Turun yliopisto, 26.09.2014)Placental insufficiency is one major cause of intrauterine growth restriction and also relates to neurodevelopment. Preterm infants with very low birth weight are at risk of postnatal growth restriction as well as ...