SolidWorks Bottom-Up versus Top-Down Approaches. The Capacity of the Top-Down Modelling.
Shakurova, Arina (2019)
Shakurova, Arina
2019
All rights reserved. This publication is copyrighted. You may download, display and print it for Your own personal use. Commercial use is prohibited.
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:amk-2019052411791
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:amk-2019052411791
Tiivistelmä
Due to the significant importance of the 3D modelling technology for the engineering companies, the two types of modelling approaches which determine the work process of the were examined.
In the following study, a comparison of the design intents and accurate evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of the Top-Down modelling approach for the utilisation in the 3D CAD software – SolidWorks - were performed in order to identify the capacity of the method in the company’s environment.
In order to obtain reliable evidence, the collaboration with a real company was arranged, the collection of the theoretic knowledge and the modelling of a shipyard box for obtaining solid empirical data were performed.
The Top-Down approach which was analysed in comparison to the Bottom-Up intent was found to be less stable, more complicated and time-consuming. When considering the results of the study, the Top-Down philosophy was considered as a not satisfying method for the entire realization, however, its tools could be solely implemented to reach beneficial outcomes.
The outputs of the thesis have an implication for the cooperating company as it will influence the development of the standard procedures’ strategy to enhance the capacity of the organisation.
In the following study, a comparison of the design intents and accurate evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of the Top-Down modelling approach for the utilisation in the 3D CAD software – SolidWorks - were performed in order to identify the capacity of the method in the company’s environment.
In order to obtain reliable evidence, the collaboration with a real company was arranged, the collection of the theoretic knowledge and the modelling of a shipyard box for obtaining solid empirical data were performed.
The Top-Down approach which was analysed in comparison to the Bottom-Up intent was found to be less stable, more complicated and time-consuming. When considering the results of the study, the Top-Down philosophy was considered as a not satisfying method for the entire realization, however, its tools could be solely implemented to reach beneficial outcomes.
The outputs of the thesis have an implication for the cooperating company as it will influence the development of the standard procedures’ strategy to enhance the capacity of the organisation.